CASE STUDY ON EK RUKA HUA FAISLA

Learning from the Movie: Then a few are there who are of the type “I am always right”. This helps to confirm your knowledge aboutthe subject plot and also to know more things which are missing or we dont know. Characteristics of 12 Jurors in the movie: Roles refer to the functions the group members are supposed to play in a group.

The particular reason for which the members of the group are attracted to the group affects the performance of the group. Thischaracterdoes not shy away from voicing his opinions and likes to maintain decorum during thediscussions. The twelve-man jury retires to a private room, where they spend a short while getting acquainted before they begin deliberating. Once a group culture is developed the members, who are in conformity with the culture, feel comfortable with the group while others might feel isolated. Remember me on this computer.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

Eventhough juror 8 exhibits leadership qualities and he cannot be called as leader but it is he who carries the group forward. Norms are the appropriate ways in which everybody is supposed to act in a situation like a group.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

He showed a lot of arrogance in his style was trying to influence othersin the favor of punishing the guilty without going over the detailed facts.

We can see various group tensions occurring in the group like for example the scapegoating of juror 2 Amitabh Srivastavawho is shy and caisla, by juror 3 who never allows him to voice his opinion, but we can see him emerging confident as he jumps over to the initial minority group.

Juror 1 Deepak Kejriwal: Other than that, he was acting like a follower and going with the flow of caze. His part in the movie is affronted by the Juror 3. That is, he showed respect to elders, others and theirpersonal life. His decision style is again a mix of a charismatic and a follower. Hence we have a very brief stage of norming here. Performing In a group the task- focused action takes place towards the final stages of the group.

  NEW BARBARISM THESIS KAPLAN

Only one juror is unconvinced of the boys involvement inthe crime resulting in a difference in opinion and further discussion on the case.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

The storming stage is a phase characterised by disagreement and conflict among the group members which often starts with turbulent outbreaks of some members resisted by other members of the group. Though he plays the role of the most divisive character who is falsely ruuka that theaccused is the murderer; his dissentious afisla was because, his only son deserted him, so thispainful relationship with his son caused anger toward all young people, thereby influencing hisvote.

He showed signs of thinker andcontroller in his decision making style.

The storming stage has started but norming is also simultaneously taking place. Middle status and high status members adhere to norms to maintain or to elevate their status in the group.

Maypole, Round robin, Hot seat, Free floating. There are twelve caae members of a jury who have gathered together in an enclosed room to deliberate on charges of murder against a young boy accused of killing his own father.

The group dynamics plays major role in the very much hypothetical journey of this group. Group dynamics can result in either positive or negative effects.

It helps in avoiding excessive conflicts and ultimately the disintegration of the whole hu. He is calm, cool, and collected, and is probably one ofthe few jury members who fully understand his role as a jury. The jurors are supposed to make a unanimous decision. Psychological Bulletin, 63, It is an orientation period when members get to know one another and share expectations about the group.

  PAGGAMIT NG WIKANG FILIPINO THESIS

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

Twelve Angry men an Analytical essay. Social integration refers to the acceptance of the members in the group and how they fit together.

The Best Way to demonstrate Group Process – Ek Ruka hua Faisla () – Affable Discourses

Click here to sign up. Group culture is influenced by many factors like the different value systems which the members bring in to the group, the environment in which the group is functioning, homogeneity of the group etc. It has the most important role to play in the progress of the group. Juror 12 Aziz Qureshi: Effects of cohesion on the group: He displaysa typical child ego state who is excited but not serious about the task assigned.

Sub groups form due to the interest alliances among the subsets of group members. A group can reach this stage unexpectedly or in a planned manner. Norms of the group and the roles adorned by the group members promote social integration.